Leeds Council refuses to listen over bus and cycle lanes – Yorkshire Post Letters
IN 2018, people were asked by Leeds City Council and Metro if they want a new bus lane and improved cycling facilities on the section of the A660 that runs across Headingley Hill.
The proposed changes would involve setting back a high stone wall which dates back to 1840, the loss of at least 20 mature trees, part of the fields that seven rescue horses currently graze on, and narrower pavements.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe results of the consultation showed that 76 people are opposed to the new bus lane, and only 30 in favour. The results also showed that 51 people are opposed to improved cycling facilities (often on environmental grounds) and that just 35 are in favour.
Given the strength of opposition to the proposals, it came as a surprise to many to learn that Metro is now asking for the £5.1m required for the road widening to go ahead.
What’s the point of having a consultation exercise when the results are ignored? It’s a waste of people’s time and public money.
From: James Dowson, Leeds.
DOES the Government seriously to expect people to cycle to work in great numbers when the winter rain and snow comes? They don’t seem to have factored the weather into their plans.
Support The Yorkshire Post and become a subscriber today.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdYour subscription will help us to continue to bring quality news to the people of Yorkshire. In return, you’ll see fewer ads on site, get free access to our app and receive exclusive members-only offers.
So, please - if you can - pay for our work. Just £5 per month is the starting point. If you think that which we are trying to achieve is worth more, you can pay us what you think we are worth. By doing so, you will be investing in something that is becoming increasingly rare. Independent journalism that cares less about right and left and more about right and wrong. Journalism you can trust.
Thank you
James Mitchinson
Comment Guidelines
National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.